|
|
||||||||
Brief Report |
Department of Family Medicine (HDC), Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
Department of Internal Medicine (LAC), Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
Department of Cardiology (JLB), Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
Correspondence: Corresponding author: Harvey D. Cassidy, MD, Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224 (E-mail: cassidy.harvey{at}mayo.edu)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although most cases of PDA would seem to occur sporadically, multifactorial inheritance is believed to underlie many cases. These people are thought to possess a genetic predisposition acted on by an environmental trigger that occurs at an unknown but vulnerable time during the pregnancy.
The clinical spectrum of presentation of a PDA may range from a "silent" PDA, one with no clinical manifestations but which is incidentally discovered on echocardiogram for other purposes, to patients who present with congestive heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, signs of volume overload, endocarditis, atrial fibrillation, or "recurrent pneumonia." We describe 2 cases that illustrate the discovery of an asymptomatic PDA during routine physical examination of adult patients.
The ductus arteriosus is a vital fetal vascular structure thought to originate from the left sixth aortic arch during embryonic development that connects the main pulmonary artery to the descending aorta. The ductus diverts blood away from the high-resistance, unexpanded fetal circulation into the descending aorta and into the fetal arterial circulation. In the fetus, the ductus remains patent because of the low arterial oxygen content and prostaglandin circulation. After delivery, however, the arterial oxygen content rises, causing a decline in pulmonary vascular resistance and immediately reversing blood flow to the ductus arteriosus. The onset of ventilation, a decline in circulating prostaglandins, and increased metabolism in the pulmonary circulation secondary to pulmonary flow promotes constriction and functional closure of the ductus generally within 10 to 15 hours after delivery, with permanent structural closure occurring within 2 to 3 weeks.
Although most cases of PDA would seem to occur sporadically, multifactorial inheritance is believed to underlie many cases. These people are thought to possess a genetic predisposition acted on by an environmental trigger that occurs at an unknown but vulnerable time during the pregnancy.4
The clinical spectrum of presentation of a PDA may range from a "silent" PDA, one with no clinical manifestations but which is incidentally discovered on echocardiogram for other purposes, to patients who present with congestive heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, signs of volume overload, endocarditis, atrial fibrillation, or recurrent pneumonia. We describe 2 cases illustrating the discovery of an asymptomatic PDA on routine physical examination of adult patients.
| Patient l |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Patient 2 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Her medical history included a hospitalization for pneumonia 4 years prior and, most recently, 1 month before her presentation at our allergy clinic she was evaluated at a nearby emergency department for "pneumonia" and was treated with a 10-day course of antibiotics.
During a review of systems she noted atypical chest discomfort that did not seem to be cardiac in nature. She denied any paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea or orthopnea, and there was no history of any functional limitations in her routine activities.
During physical examination the cardiac examination was notable for a prominent grade 3/6 systolic murmur best heard at the left upper sternal border second intercostal space with radiation into the anterior left chest. No gallops, thrills, heaves, or rubs were noted. The second heart sound was physiologically split, suggesting an absence of significant pulmonary hypertension. Peripheral pulses seemed to be normal, with no evidence of pulse deficit. No diastolic murmurs were heard. As part of her evaluation, an exercise echocardiogram was performed and revealed no regional wall motion abnormalities and no evidence of ischemia. Resting echocardiogram revealed the presence of a PDA in the setting of normal left ventricular function. Doppler derived pulmonary artery mean pressure was 26 mm Hg, consistent with mild pulmonary hypertension (25–35 mm Hg). Moderate left and right atrial enlargement and a mildly enlarged main pulmonary artery were noted.
Cardiology consultation was requested and, in light of her mild pulmonary hypertension, dilated pulmonary artery, left atrial enlargement, and recurrent pneumonia, the option of transcatheter or surgical closure was discussed with the patient. However, because this patient had no loss of functional capacity and preferred noninvasive therapy, she chose a conservative approach with a follow-up echocardiogram in 1 year unless she should become symptomatic or have a decline in functional capacity. At this time, the patient continues to do well and has no functional limitations. Maintenance of good oral hygiene and appropriate routine dental care was stressed to the patient.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical manifestations of PDA may vary greatly among people and are dependent on size of the ductus, the age of the patient, the pressure differential across the ductus, and the presence or absence of pulmonary hypertension. Some patients with an underlying PDA may be quite symptomatic, presenting with congestive heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, signs of volume overload, atrial fibrillation, recurrent pneumonia, or other complications known to be associated with PDA. Others have no signs or symptoms, and a "silent" PDA may be discovered only incidentally on an echocardiogram done for other purposes. Clinical recognition of a PDA in an adult who was born premature is usually made when a murmur is present or when oxygen requirement increases during the course of recovery from lung disease.6 Asymptomatic PDAs, tolerated for many years without clinical signs or symptoms, may become clinically significant in patients with unrepaired PDAs when acquired conditions such as recurrent pneumonia, the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or the manifestations of valvular or ischemic heart disease are superimposed.
Physical examination findings can vary significantly depending on the pressure dynamics across the ductus. Findings, when present, may include a wide pulse pressure with prominent or bounding peripheral pulses, hyperdynamic apical pulse, continuous murmur localized to the left infraclavicular area or upper left sternal border, diastolic rumble, narrow or single S2 suggestive of increased pulmonary vascular resistance, visible carotid pulsations, and suprasternal notch thrill. Chest radiographs in patients with PDA may be normal or may show increased pulmonary vascular markings, enlargement of the main pulmonary artery, and occasionally calcification of the ductus, particularly evidenced in adults.
Typically, echocardiogram is used to confirm the diagnosis of PDA as well as to determine characteristics such as size, shape, and location of the persistent vascular channel. It also may provide very useful information about the effect of the PDA on cardiovascular dynamics such as pulmonary artery pressure and atrial size, as well as left ventricular size and function. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic angiography may provide further useful information for characterizing the PDA as well as establishing the surgical candidacy of the patient. Cardiac catheterization may be useful to determine that the patient is hemodynamically an appropriate candidate for closure.
Treatment of PDA in premature infants is controversial. According to Clyman and Chorne, "in recent years there has been a growing debate about whether or not to treat a persistent PDA during the neonatal period. Preterm infants have a high rate of spontaneous PDA closure during the first 2 years."7 They suggest that the early treatment may unnecessarily expose infants to both pharmacological and surgical treatment that they may not need and which could produce unnecessary morbidity or mortality. Recently, in preterm infants, conservative treatments using the adjustment of ventilation by reducing inspiratory time and giving more positive end-expiratory pressure and fluid restriction exceeding 130 mL/kg/day beyond day 3 has produced a high closure rate of PDA in at least one study.2 In preterm infants, pharmacological or transcatheter occlusion are the preferred alternatives to surgical ligation in most cases.8 In the older infant or child, transcatheter occlusion is generally the preferred treatment of choice.9 For adults, transcatheter occlusion of the patent ductus is the preferred treatment when possible.8 However, in adults with large, unfavorably shaped ducts, surgical ligation is a safe and effective alternative although calcification of the ductus may increase the technical difficulty of the procedure.
Small PDAs (those with ductal diameter of 1.5–2.5 mm) without hemodynamic overload are generally closed because of the risk of subacute bacterial endocarditis. Medium and large-sized PDAs (larger than 2.5 mm) should be closed to prevent volume overload of the left ventricle, prevent pulmonary vascular obstructive disease, and to treat congestive heart failure.3 Closure of "silent" PDAs remains controversial and requires further research.
The need for bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis in an unrepaired PDA remains controversial. Subacute bacterial endocarditis has been reported in both symptomatic and "silent" PDAs. Recent guidelines from the American Heart Association of the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki disease do not recommend routine subacute bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis for unrepaired PDAs. However, decisions regarding prophylaxis in patients should be made in conjunction with a cardiologist who is well-versed in the evaluation and management of congenital heart disease. Meticulous attention to oral hygiene and regular access to appropriate dental care should be emphasized to all patients.5
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Notes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Received for publication October 24, 2007. Revision received July 30, 2008. Accepted for publication August 13, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Bowman and A. V. Neale Women's Physical Health, Mental Health, and Practical Hints for Common Practice Issues J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2009; 22(2): 99 - 101. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |