|
|
||||||||
Clinical Review |
State University of New York at Stony Brook, Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY
Correspondence: Corresponding author: Raja Jaber, MD, Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Health Science Center, Level 4, SUNY at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8461 (E-mail: rjaber{at}notes.cc.sunysb.edu)
Purpose: The group visit model has emerged as one possible solution to problems posed by the limitations of current structures of care and the demands of a growing chronic illness load. In this article, we summarize current group visit research and develop suggestions for furthering this care model.
Methods: An electronic review of all group visit articles published from the years 1974 to 2004 was conducted via the PubMed and MedLine databases. Reference sections of articles thus obtained were mined for additional citations. Articles were excluded if: (1) they were not research studies (ie, purely descriptive, with no evaluative component); or (2) the group visit intervention was subsumed under larger primary or hospital-based interventions.
Results: Although the heterogeneity of the studies presented renders the assessment of this care model problematic, there is sufficient data to support the effectiveness of group visits in improving patient and physician satisfaction, quality of care, quality of life, and in decreasing emergency department and specialist visits.
Conclusion: Group visits are a promising approach to chronic care management for the motivated patient. Future research may benefit, however, from abandoning old nomenclatures and clearly defining the structure, processes of care, content of visits, and appropriate outcome measures.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Edelman, S. K. Fredrickson, S. D. Melnyk, C. J. Coffman, A. S. Jeffreys, S. Datta, G. L. Jackson, A. C. Harris, N. S. Hamilton, H. Stewart, et al. Medical Clinics Versus Usual Care for Patients With Both Diabetes and Hypertension: A Randomized Trial Ann Intern Med, June 1, 2010; 152(11): 689 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Coker, M. A. Rodriguez, and G. Flores Family-Centered Care for US Children With Special Health Care Needs: Who Gets It and Why? Pediatrics, June 1, 2010; 125(6): 1159 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Coker, P. J. Chung, B. O. Cowgill, L. Chen, and M. A. Rodriguez Low-Income Parents' Views on the Redesign of Well-Child Care Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): 194 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Davis, D. R. Sawyer, and L. M. Vinci The Potential of Group Visits in Diabetes Care Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2008; 26(2): 58 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S R Kirsh and D C Aron Integrating the chronic-care model and the ACGME competencies: using shared medical appointments to focus on systems-based practice Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2008; 17(1): 15 - 19. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H Wagner Diversifying the options for interacting with patients Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2007; 83(986): 723 - 724. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H Wagner Diversifying the options for interacting with patients Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 322 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kirsh, S. Watts, K. Pascuzzi, M. E. O'Day, D. Davidson, G. Strauss, E. O Kern, and D. C Aron Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: a quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 349 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Jaber Group Visits Offer Practical, Effective Care DOC News, February 1, 2007; 4(2): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
News and Viewpoints Chronic Illness, September 1, 2006; 2(3): 163 - 164. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |